LUCIUS v. DOONEY & BOURKE INC.

    Plaintiff

    • Name: Windy Lucius
    • Filing date: May 11, 2020
    • State of filing: Florida

    Defendant

    • Name: Dooney & Bourke, Inc.
    • Website: www.dooney.com
    • Industry: Consumer Goods
    • Summary: Dooney & Bourke is a company specializing in fashion accessories, such as handbags, luggage, bracelets, watches, and briefcases.

    Case Summary

    On May 11, 2020, Windy Lucius filed a Complaint in Florida Federal court against Dooney & Bourke, Inc. . Plaintiff Windy Lucius alleges that www.dooney.com is not accessible per the WCAG 2.1 accessibility standard(s).

    Case Details

    Plaintiff alleges issues in its Complaint including the following:

    • Defendant’s app does not properly interact with Apple’s assistive technology in a manner that will allow the blind and visually impaired to enjoy the app
    • Defendant’s app did not integrate with Plaintiff’s software, nor was there any function within the app to permit access for visually impaired individuals through other means

    Plaintiff asserts the following cause(s) of action in its Complaint:

    • Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.

    Plaintiff seeks the following relief by way of its Complaint:

    • A Declaratory Judgment that at the commencement of this action Defendant was in violation of the specific requirements of Title III of the ADA described above, and the relevant implementing regulations of the ADA, in that Defendant took no action that was reasonably calculated to ensure that its app is fully accessible to, and independently usable by, blind individuals
    • A permanent injunction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12188(a)(2) and 28 CFR § 36.504 (a) which directs Defendant to take all steps necessary to brings its app into full compliance with the requirements set forth in the ADA, and its implementing regulations, so that its app is fully accessible to, and independently usable by, blind individuals, and which further directs that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period to be determined to ensure that Defendant has adopted and is following an institutional policy that will in fact cause Defendant to remain fully in compliance with the law
    • Payment of costs of suit
    • Payment of reasonable attorneys’ fees, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12205 and 28 CFR § 36.505
    • The provision of whatever other relief the Court deems just, equitable and appropriate.

    Comments