Plaintiff
- Name: WASHINGTON MORAN
- Filing Date: October 10, 2025
- Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
- State: New York
- Attorney Firm: GOTTLIEB & ASSOCIATES PLLC
Defendant
- Name: ANASTASIA BEVERLY HILLS, LLC
- Website: www.anastasiabeverlyhills.com
- Industry: Beauty
- Summary: Operates an online retail store offering cosmetics and beauty products, including information about pricing, terms of service, and promotions.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Plaintiff WASHINGTON MORAN, a visually-impaired individual, is suing ANASTASIA BEVERLY HILLS, LLC for failing to make its website accessible as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The website, https://www.anastasiabeverlyhills.com/, allegedly contains multiple barriers that prevent blind users from accessing its content and services, including lack of alternative text for images and broken links. Plaintiffs allege that these barriers deny them equal access to the goods and services offered online. They seek a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and claim damages for the discrimination faced. The case is filed in the Southern District of New York.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA
- Violations of the NYSHRL
- Violations of the NYCHRL
- Violation of GBL § 349
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers on the website.
- Defendant has failed to comply with the ADA and other relevant laws.
Requested Relief
- Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its website accessible to blind individuals.
- Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under various laws.
- Attorney's fees and costs.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
The Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12181, as Plaintiff’s claims arise under Title III of the ADA.




Comments