Plaintiff
- Name: Tera Donahue
- Filing date: February 13, 2020
- State of filing: Illinois
Defendant
- Name: Fleet Farm E-Commerce Enterprises LLC
- Website: www.fleetfarm.com
- Industry: Consumer Goods
- Summary: Fleet Farm is a chain of outdoor and sporting goods stores selling a wide array of hunting, fishing, automotive, pet, farm, home improvement, and holiday products at retail and via its website.
Case Summary
On February 13, 2020, Tera Donahue filed a Complaint in Illinois Federal court against Fleet Farm E-Commerce Enterprises LLC. Plaintiff Tera Donahue alleges that www.fleetfarm.com is not accessible.
Case Details
Plaintiff alleges issues in its Complaint including the following:
- Defendant’s Website is so constructed that the content in the department’s dropdown is not accessible for keyboard-only users. The “Shop Departments” dropdown shows a long list of all departments and their merchandise. When a user clicks on the “Shop Departments” element, nothing noticeable happens and the drop-down content is not revealed. Keyboard-only users cannot access this content. It only works with a mouse.
- Defendant’s Website’s pop-up is not given focus and a user is unable to add their item to the cart. When a user tries to add an item to their cart and has not yet selected a store, a pop-up is displayed. A user must select a store to continue. Screen reader users are not notified that a pop-up with a required field is present and will be unable to continue with a purchase.
- Defendant’s Website’s “Make This My Store” element is not actionable to keyboard-only users. The element comes into focus under the keyboard-only user’s arrow, but it is not actionable due to it not having the proper role. This means that the user is unable to take full advantage of the website’s elements.
Plaintiff asserts the following cause(s) of action in its Complaint:
Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.
Plaintiff seeks the following relief by way of its Complaint:
- A Declaratory Judgment that at the commencement of this action Defendant was in violation of the specific requirements of Title III of the ADA described above, and the relevant implementing regulations of the ADA, in that Defendant took no action that was reasonably calculated to ensure that its Website is fully accessible to, and independently usable by, individuals with visual disabilities;
- A permanent injunction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12188(a)(2), 28 CFR § 36.504(a), N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., and the laws of New York, which directs Defendant to take all steps necessary to bring its Website into full compliance with the requirements set forth in the ADA, and its implementing regulations, so that its Website is fully accessible to, and independently usable by, blind individuals, and which further directs that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period to be determined to ensure that Defendant has adopted and is following an institutional policy that will in fact cause it to remain fully in compliance with the law—the specific injunctive relief requested by Plaintiff is described more fully in paragraph 11 above.
- Payment of actual, statutory, and punitive damages, as the Court deems proper;
- Payment of costs of suit;
- Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by proof, including all applicable statutory damages and fines, to Plaintiff for violations of her civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law;
- Payment of reasonable attorneys’ fees, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12205 and 28 CFR § 36.505, including costs of monitoring Defendant’s compliance with the judgment (see Access Now, Inc. v. Lax World, LLC, No. 1:17-cv-10976-DJC (D. Mass. Apr. 17, 2018) (ECF 11) (“Plaintiffs, as the prevailing party, may file a fee petition before the Court surrenders jurisdiction. Pursuant to Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 559 (1986), supplemented, 483 U.S. 711 (1987), and Garrity v. Sununu, 752 F.2d 727, 738-39 (1st Cir. 1984), the fee petition may include costs to monitor Defendant’s compliance with the permanent injunction.”); see also Gniewkowski v. Lettuce Entertain You Enterprises, Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv01898-AJS (W.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2018) (ECF 191) (same);
- Whatever other relief the Court deems just, equitable and appropriate; and
- An Order retaining jurisdiction over this case until Defendant has complied with the Court’s Orders.
Comments