Plaintiff
- Name: LAURENCE WILLS
- Filing Date: October 10, 2025
- Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
- State: New York
- Attorney Firm: STEIN SAKS, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: ALUMNI OF NY, INC.
- Website: www.hatchetsupply.com
- Industry: Apparel
- Summary: Offers products and services for online sale, including a curated collection of exclusive footwear and streetwear, allowing users to browse for items, inquire about pricing, and receive product updates and promotions.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Laurence Wills, a visually impaired individual, is suing Alumni of NY, Inc. for failing to make their website, www.hatchetsupply.com, accessible. Wills alleges that he encountered numerous barriers while attempting to use the site to purchase Adidas sneakers, which prevented him from accessing the goods and services offered. The complaint cites violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL), claiming that the website does not comply with accessibility standards. Wills seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and compensatory damages for the alleged discrimination.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Violations of the NYCHRL
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers preventing full use of the website.
- Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make the website accessible.
- Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York City Human Rights Law.
- Attorney's fees and costs.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182, and venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).




Comments