Plaintiff
- Name: Zachary Morris
- Filing Date: May 3, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin
- State: Wisconsin
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: The Marcus Corporation
- Website: www.grandgeneva.com
- Industry: Hotel, Restaurant and Leisure
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: Offers hotel accommodations, amenities, and services including golf courses, a spa, dining options, and event spaces.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, plaintiff Zachary Morris, a visually impaired individual, is suing The Marcus Corporation for failing to make its website, www.grandgeneva.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The plaintiff alleges that he encountered numerous barriers while attempting to book a hotel room, including missing alt-text and broken links, which prevented him from accessing the services offered. Morris seeks a permanent injunction requiring the defendant to comply with accessibility standards and to ensure that the website is usable by blind individuals. The complaint also seeks class certification for all legally blind individuals who have faced similar issues with the website.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers preventing him from booking a hotel room on the website.
- Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
- An order requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
- Payment of nominal damages.
- An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).

