Plaintiff
- Name: Mary Matyas
- Filing date: July 2, 2019
- State of filing: California
Defendant
- Name: Eres LLC
- Website: www.eresparis.com/en/
- Industry: Apparel
- Summary: Eres LLC is a women's clothing and accessories retailer.
Case Summary
On July 2, 2019, Mary Matyas filed a Complaint in California State court against Eres LLC. Plaintiff Mary Matyas alleges that www.eresparis.com/en/ is not accessible per the Section 508 accessibility standard(s).
Case Details
Plaintiff alleges issues in its Complaint including the following:
- ack of alt-text or text equivalent on graphics
- website also lacks prompting information and accommodations necessary to allow visually impaired shoppers who use screen readers to locate and accurately fill-out online information.
- numerous instances of empty links, labels and/or headings
- several occurrences where functions cannot be performed using a keyboard and screen reader
Plaintiff asserts the following cause(s) of action in its Complaint:
- Violation of Unruh Civil Rights Act (California Civil Code §§ 51, 52, et seq.
Plaintiff seeks the following relief by way of its Complaint:
- A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendants from further violations of the UCRA, Civil Code §§ 51, et seq., with respect to their Website, https://www.eresparis.com/en/, and all of the webpages and urls contained therein
- A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendants to take the steps necessary to make their Website readily and fully accessible to and usable by blind and visuallyimpaired individuals. Plaintiff expressly limits the cost of injunctive relief sought in sections A and B to $15,000 or less
- An award of statutory minimum damages of $4,000 per violation pursuant to § 52(a) of the California Civil Code
- For attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to all applicable laws including, without limitation, pursuant to California Civil Code § 52(a)
- For pre-judgment interest to the extent permitted by law
- For costs of suit
- For such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
Comments