TATUM-RIOS v. THE NATORI RETAIL COMPANY INCORPORATED

    Plaintiff

    • Name: Lynette Tatum-Rios
    • Filing date: June 15, 2019
    • State of filing: New York

    Defendant

    • Name: Natori Retail Company Incorporated
    • Website: www.natori.com
    • Industry: Apparel
    • Summary: Natori Retail Company Incorporated manufactures and sells designer lingerie and sleepwear under the Natori band name.

    Case Summary

    On June 15, 2019, Lynette Tatum-Rios filed a Complaint in New York Federal court against Natori Retail Company Incorporated. Plaintiff Lynette Tatum-Rios alleges that www.natori.com is not accessible per the WCAG 2.0 accessibility standard(s).

    Case Details

    Plaintiff alleges issues in its Complaint including the following:

    • Lack of alt-text for images.
    • Fieldset elements are not labeled with legend elements.
    • Links use general text like “more” with no surrounding text explaining the link’s purpose.
    • Frames do not have a title.
    • Webpages have duplicate IDs which can cause problems in screen readers.
    • Radio button groups are not contained in a fieldset element.
    • Webpages have no headings, and headings are not nested correctly.
    • Several links on a page share the same link text, but go to different destinations.
    • Webpages have markup errors.

    Plaintiff asserts the following cause(s) of action in its Complaint:

     

    • Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq. 
    • New York State Human Rights Law
    • New York City Human Rights Law
    • Declaratory Relief

    Plaintiff seeks the following relief by way of its Complaint:

    • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant
      from violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of
      New York;
    • A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take all the steps necessary to make its Website into full compliance with the requirements set forth in the ADA, and its implementing regulations, so that the Website is readily accessible to and usable by blind individuals;
    • A declaration that Defendant owns, maintains and/or operates its Website in a manner that discriminates against the blind and which fails to provide access for persons with disabilities as required by Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§
      12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York;
    • An order certifying the Class and Sub-Classes under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) & (b)(2) and/or (b)(3), appointing Plaintiff as Class Representative, and his attorneys as Class Counsel;
    • Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by proof, including all applicable statutory and punitive damages and fines, to Plaintiff and the proposed class and subclasses for violations of their civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law and City Law;
    • Pre- and post-judgment interest;
    • An award of costs and expenses of the action together with
      reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees; and
    • Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. 

     

    Comments