Plaintiff
- Name: Kevin Orcel
- Filing Date: April 1, 2026
- Court: United States District Court District of New Jersey
- State: New Jersey
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Satya Beverages, LLC
- Website: www.meximodo.com
- Industry: Food, Beverage & Tobacco
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: A restaurant specializing in Mexican cuisine, offering a range of entrees, appetizers, and specialty dishes with a full-service dining experience.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Kevin Orcel, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Satya Beverages, LLC for failing to make its website, www.meximodo.com, accessible to blind users as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Orcel alleges that he encountered multiple barriers while attempting to access the website to make a reservation at the restaurant, which prevented him from enjoying the same experience as sighted individuals. The complaint cites specific access issues, including missing alt-text and unclear labels for interactive elements. Orcel seeks a permanent injunction requiring the defendant to comply with accessibility standards and to ensure that the website is usable by blind individuals. He also requests damages and costs associated with the lawsuit.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff was denied the ability to make a reservation due to website barriers.
- Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
- An order requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
- A declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against the blind.
- Payment of nominal damages.
- An award of costs and expenses of this action.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).

