Plaintiff
- Name: Kevin Orcel
- Filing Date: March 4, 2026
- Court: United States District Court District of New Jersey
- State: New Jersey
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Raoul's Restaurant Corporation
- Website: www.raouls.com
- Industry: Hotel, Restaurant and Leisure
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: A restaurant offering a curated selection of dishes, beverages, and dining services, including the ability to make reservations online.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Kevin Orcel, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Raoul's Restaurant Corporation for failing to make its website, www.raouls.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Orcel alleges that he encountered multiple barriers while attempting to access the website to make a reservation, which prevented him from enjoying the same services as sighted individuals. The complaint cites specific access issues and claims that the website does not comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Orcel seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and to certify a class of similarly situated individuals.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff was denied the ability to make a reservation due to website barriers.
- Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
- An order requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
- A declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against the blind.
- Certification of the Class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
- Payment of nominal damages.
- Pre- and post-judgment interest.
- An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).
