FRANCISCO ANDRES RODRIGUEZ v. LASINO INC d/b/a NOO BOWL

Filed August 13, 2021

Plaintiff

Name: FRANCISCO ANDRES RODRIGUEZ
Filing date: August 13, 2021
State of filing: California

Defendant

Name: LASINO INC d/b/a NOO BOWL
Website: www.noobowl.com
Industry: Consumer Services
Summary: NooBowl is a restaurant offering Chinese street food, such as noodles and rice bowls.

Case Summary

On August 13, 2021, FRANCISCO ANDRES RODRIGUEZ filed a complaint in California against LASINO INC d/b/a NOO BOWL. Plaintiff FRANCISCO ANDRES RODRIGUEZ alleges that www.noobowl.com is not sufficiently digitally accessible.

NooBowl is a restaurant offering Chinese street food, such as noodles and rice bowls.

Accessibility Overlays

A scan for 3^rd Party Overlays was performed on August 21, 2021 and 'HikeOrders Accessibility Enabler' was detected. Typically overlays, or widgets, apply the third-party's source code to the existing code of the host website in an effort to change the user experience by overriding or adding to the existing code. Overlays are often added instead of manually identifying or resolving accessibility barriers in a website's code and design, which would generally occur during an audit or test from an accessibility subject matter expert. By not addressing the underlying cause of accessibility barriers, the effectiveness of overlays has been debated. There has also been an increase in the number of lawsuits against websites that use third-party overlays.