Plaintiff
- Name: Edery Herrera
- Filing Date: January 29, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Southern District of New York
- State: New York
- Attorney Firm: Gottlieb & Associates PLLC
Defendant
- Name: The Frick Collection
- Website: www.frick.org
- Industry: Consumer Services
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.0
- Summary: Operates an online retail store and art museum, providing access to art collections, goods, and services.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Edery Herrera, a visually-impaired individual, is suing The Frick Collection for failing to make its website accessible to blind users. The complaint alleges that the website, https://www.frick.org, contains multiple barriers that prevent blind individuals from accessing its goods and services, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The plaintiff claims that these barriers include a lack of alternative text for images, broken links, and other accessibility issues that hinder the use of screen-reading software. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to improve the website's accessibility and compensatory damages for the alleged discrimination.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA
- Violations of the NYSHRL
- Violations of the NYCHRL
- Violation of GBL § 349
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired persons.
- Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers while attempting to use the website.
- Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.0 guidelines for web accessibility.
Requested Relief
- Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its Website accessible to blind individuals.
- Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law and GBL § 349.
- Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
The Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12181, as Plaintiff’s claims arise under Title III of the ADA and related state laws.

