SANCHEZ v. BECKETT COLLECTIBLES, LLC,

    Plaintiff

    • Name: Cristian Sanchez
    • Filing date: February 24, 2021
    • State of filing: New York

    Defendant

    • Name: Beckett Collectibles, LLC
    • Website: www.beckett.com
    • Industry: Leisure Products
    • Summary: Beckett is a sports collectibles conglomerate manufacturing and selling baseball, football, and basketball cards and price guides, as well as offering grading services for cards, autographs, and comics.

    Case Summary

    On February 24, 2021, Cristian Sanchez filed a Complaint in New York Federal court against Beckett Collectibles, LLC. Plaintiff Cristian Sanchez alleges that www.beckett.com is not accessible per the WCAG 2.0, WCAG 2.1 accessibility standard(s).

    Case Details

    Plaintiff alleges issues in its Complaint including the following:

    • Lack of Alternative Text (“alt-text”), or a text equivalent. Alt-text is an invisible code embedded beneath a graphical image on a website. Web accessibility requires that alt-text be coded with each picture so that screen-reading software can speak the alt-text where a sighted user sees pictures, which includes captcha prompts. Alt- text does not change the visual presentation, but instead a text box shows when the cursor moves over the picture. The lack of alt-text on these graphics prevents screen readers from accurately vocalizing a description of the graphics.
    • Empty Links That Contain No Text causing the function or purpose of the link to not be presented to the user. This can introduce confusion for keyboard and screen- reader users;
    • Redundant Links where adjacent links go to the same URL address which results in additional navigation and repetition for keyboard and screen-reader users; and
    • Linked Images Missing Alt-text, which causes problems if an image within a link contains no text and that image does not provide alt-text. A screen reader then has no content to present the user as to the function of the link, including information contained in PDFs.
    • Icon like search button is not labeled properly. The description provides "button, scan". This flaw creates issues for the interpretation performed by the screen reader and therefore bars the user from understanding the information the website is to report back to the user.
    • The website contains social media links as an additional source to stay connected with Ricoh. The links lacks proper description. The screen reader would read "link," with no other description thus barring the user from any understanding as to what to do with the "link".
    • The website contains a button designed to take the user back to the top of the website. This button is labeled as "button" with no other description. This lack of information prevents the user from understanding the purpose of the "button".
    • Products have text that describe details of the item and price. The product pricing and some of the description is not labeled to integrate with screen reader and therefore, overlooks important information that a customer would require to complete a purchase.
    • The website permits the user to buy quantities of its product greater than one. The website lacks sufficient description describing the quantity feature and only presents "edit one scan off one selected" as the description. The lack of detail is confusing for a user with low or no vision.

    Plaintiff asserts the following cause(s) of action in its Complaint:

    • VIOLATIONS OF THE ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.
    • VIOLATIONS OF THE NYSHRL
    • VIOLATION OF THE NEW YORK STATE CIVIL RIGHTS LAW
    • VIOLATIONS OF THE NYCHRL
    • DECLARATORY RELIEF

    Plaintiff seeks the following relief by way of its Complaint:

    • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York;
    • A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take all the steps necessary to make its Website into full compliance with the requirements set forth in the ADA, and its implementing regulations, so that the Website is readily accessible to and usable by blind individuals;
    • A declaration that Defendant owns, maintains and/or operates its Website in a manner that discriminates against the blind and which fails to provide access for persons with disabilities as required by Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq.,
      N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York
    • An order certifying the Class and Sub-Classes under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) & (b)(2) and/or (b)(3), appointing Plaintiff as Class Representative, and his attorneys as Class Counsel;
    • Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by proof, including all applicable statutory and punitive damages and fines, to
    • Plaintiff and the proposed class and subclasses for violations of their civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law and City Law;
    • Pre- and post-judgment interest;
    • An award of costs and expenses of this action together with
      reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees; and
    • Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. 

    Comments