Skip to main content
Accessibility.com, LLC
The state of ai impact assessment

SANCHEZ v. AUCTION EDGE, INC

Filed March 9, 2021

Plaintiff

  • Name: Cristian Sanchez
  • Filing date: March 9, 2021
  • State of filing: New York

Defendant

  • Name: Auction Edge, Inc.
  • Website: www.americasautoauction.com
  • Industry: Automobile
  • Summary: Auction Edge, Inc. operates America's Auto Auction, a chain of automobile auction houses with online and mobile application platforms.

Case Summary

On March 9, 2021, Cristian Sanchez filed a Complaint in New York Federal court against Auction Edge, Inc.. Plaintiff Cristian Sanchez alleges that www.americasautoauction.com is not accessible per the WCAG 2.0, WCAG 2.1 accessibility standard(s).

Case Details

Plaintiff alleges issues in its Complaint including the following:

  • Lack of Alternative Text (“alt-text”), or a text equivalent. Alt-text is an invisible code embedded beneath a graphical image on a website. Web accessibility requires that alt-text be coded with each picture so that screen-reading software can speak the alt-text where a sighted user sees pictures, which includes captcha prompts. Alt- text does not change the visual presentation, but instead a text box shows when the cursor moves over the picture. The lack of alt-text on these graphics prevents screen readers from accurately vocalizing a description of the graphics.
  • Empty Links That Contain No Text causing the function or purpose of the link to not be presented to the user. This can introduce confusion for keyboard and screen- reader users;
    Redundant Links where adjacent links go to the same URL address which results in additional navigation and repetition for keyboard and screen-reader users; and
  • Linked Images Missing Alt-text, which causes problems if an image within a link contains no text and that image does not provide alt-text. A screen reader then has no content to present the user as to the function of the link, including information contained in PDFs.
  • The logo and home icon found on this site, which acts as a link to the homepage, are mislabeled as "link" with no other description and cannot therefore be interpreted by any screen reader as to what the link and graphic represents nor the underlying purpose of creating a way to return to the site's homepage.
  • The telephone number provided on the website lacks a full description. It is read as a number and image; however, it does not specify it is a telephone number, thus, barring the user from any understanding as to what to the number/image is for.
  • Some of the links found on the website such as "login, register, about us, covid-19 sales..." are labeled as "link" with no other description. The lack of sufficient description is confusing therefore bars the user from any understanding as to what to do with the "link".
  • Rotating banner found on the website providing weekly specials mislabeled as "link" with no other description. This issue prevents the user from accessing any information regarding the specials and thus fails to provide the user sufficient information for deciding if they wish to take advantage of the opportunity presented.
  • Text providing information regarding "Online Access Benefits" are not labeled to integrate with a screen reader. The text and image are inaccessible thus barring the user from accessing vital information to decide if the wish to register

Plaintiff asserts the following cause(s) of action in its Complaint:

  • VIOLATIONS OF THE ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.
  • VIOLATIONS OF THE NYSHRL
  • VIOLATION OF THE NEW YORK STATE CIVIL RIGHTS LAW
  • VIOLATIONS OF THE NYCHRL
  • DECLARATORY RELIEF

Plaintiff seeks the following relief by way of its Complaint:

  • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York;
  • A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take all the steps necessary to make its Website into full compliance with the requirements set forth in the ADA, and its implementing regulations, so that the Website is readily accessible to and usable by blind individuals;
  • A declaration that Defendant owns, maintains and/or operates its Website in a manner that discriminates against the blind and which fails to provide access for persons with disabilities as required by Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq.,
    N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York
  • An order certifying the Class and Sub-Classes under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) & (b)(2) and/or (b)(3), appointing Plaintiff as Class Representative, and his attorneys as Class Counsel;
  • Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by proof, including all applicable statutory and punitive damages and fines, to
  • Plaintiff and the proposed class and subclasses for violations of their civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law and City Law;
  • Pre- and post-judgment interest;
  • An award of costs and expenses of this action together with
    reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees; and
  • Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. 

New YorkAutomobile

Application Security Isn’t Optional Anymore.