Plaintiff
- Name: Zachary Morris
- Filing Date: March 4, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin
- State: Wisconsin
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Recycline, Inc.
- Website: www.preserve.eco
- Industry: Consumer Goods
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: An online retailer specializing in sustainable consumer goods made from recycled and recyclable materials, offering products such as oral care, kitchenware, tableware, and travel accessories.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, plaintiff Zachary Morris, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Recycline, Inc. for failing to make its website, www.preserve.eco, accessible to blind users, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Morris alleges that he encountered multiple barriers while attempting to access the website to purchase a Toothbrush Lightweight Pouch, which prevented him from completing the transaction. The complaint cites various access barriers, including missing alt-text and broken links, which hinder the usability of the website for visually-impaired individuals. Morris seeks a permanent injunction requiring Recycline to comply with accessibility standards and to implement changes to ensure equal access for all users.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied him full access to the website.
- Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
- An injunction requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
- A declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against the blind.
- Certification of the Class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
- Payment of nominal damages.
- Pre- and post-judgment interest.
- An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).

