Plaintiff
- Name: Zachary Morris
- Filing Date: March 29, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin
- State: Wisconsin
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: K-Swiss, Inc.
- Website: www.kswiss.com
- Industry: Apparel
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: Offers athletic footwear, apparel, and accessories, with an emphasis on court-inspired designs and performance-driven products.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, plaintiff Zachary Morris, a visually-impaired individual, is suing K-Swiss, Inc. for failing to make its website, www.kswiss.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Morris alleges that he encountered multiple barriers while attempting to access the website to purchase athletic footwear, specifically the ST329 CMF model. The complaint cites various access issues, including missing alt-text and broken links, which hinder the use of screen-reading software. Morris seeks a permanent injunction to require K-Swiss to comply with accessibility standards and to ensure that visually-impaired consumers can independently access the website.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied full access to the website.
- Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
- An injunction requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
- A declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against the blind.
- Certification of the Class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
- Payment of nominal damages.
- Pre- and post-judgment interest.
- An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).

