Plaintiff
- Name: Victor Lopez
- Filing Date: July 9, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Southern District of New York
- State: New York
- Attorney Firm: Gottlieb & Associates PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Chromcraft Revington Douglas IND LTD
- Website: www.chromcrafthome.com
- Industry: Retailing
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.0
- Summary: Operates an online retail store offering furniture and home décor products.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Victor Lopez, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Chromcraft Revington Douglas Ind Ltd for failing to make its website accessible to blind users, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Lopez alleges that he encountered numerous barriers while trying to access the website to purchase furniture, including missing alt-text for images and broken links. He seeks a permanent injunction requiring the defendant to improve website accessibility and claims that the lack of access has caused him frustration and humiliation. The complaint also cites violations of New York state laws regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA
- Violations of the NYSHRL
- Violations of the NYCHRL
- Violation of GBL § 349
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers while attempting to use the website.
- Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.0 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA and related laws.
- A declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against the blind.
- Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York laws.
Proposed Class
all legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period
Jurisdiction & Venue
The Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12181, and supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367.

