Plaintiff
- Name: Tazinique Echols
- Filing Date: February 11, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Equal Access Law Group, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Vidaxl LLC
- Website: www.vidaxl.com
- Industry: Retailing
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.2
- Summary: Provides an online platform for consumers to purchase a wide array of goods including furniture, hardware, pet supplies, vehicle parts, home and garden goods, sporting goods, and toys.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Tazinique Echols, a visually impaired individual, is suing Vidaxl LLC for failing to make its website, https://www.vidaxl.com/, accessible to blind users. Echols alleges that the website contains significant barriers that prevent her and others from completing transactions independently, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The complaint details various accessibility issues, including lack of alt-text for images and reliance on mouse navigation, which excludes visually impaired individuals from accessing the goods and services offered. Echols seeks a permanent injunction to require Vidaxl to make its website accessible and compensatory damages for the discrimination faced by her and other class members.
Causes of Action
- Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals
- Defendant failed to provide necessary accommodations for screen-reader users
- Access barriers prevent visually impaired individuals from completing transactions
Requested Relief
- Permanent injunction to make the Website accessible
- Compensatory damages for Class Members
- Certification of the case as a class action
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access the Website and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by the Website, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
Subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).
