Plaintiff
- Name: Tanisia Bowman
- Filing Date: December 16, 2025
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Equal Access Law Group, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Luxury Time Pieces by Razny Jewelers, LLC
- Website: razny.com
- Industry: Retailing
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.2
- Summary: Provides a wide array of jewelry and accessories, including engagement rings, diamond earrings, watches, bracelets, necklaces, and custom-designed jewelry for online purchase.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, TANISIA BOWMAN, a visually impaired individual, is suing Luxury Time Pieces by Razny Jewelers, LLC for failing to make their website, https://razny.com, accessible to blind and visually impaired users. The plaintiff alleges that the website contains significant access barriers that prevent her from completing transactions independently, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). BOWMAN claims that the website's design lacks necessary features for screen-reader compatibility, making it impossible for her and others like her to navigate and purchase products. She seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and compensatory damages for the discrimination faced by her and the class members.
Causes of Action
- Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals
- Failure to provide necessary accommodations for screen-reader users
- Denial of equal access to goods and services offered online
Requested Relief
- Permanent injunction to make the Website accessible
- Compensatory damages for Class Members
- Certification of the case as a class action
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access the Website and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by the Website, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).
