Plaintiff
- Name: Rosemarie Ramirez
- Filing Date: July 8, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Kentucky Home Fashion, LLC
- Website: www.magnushomeproducts.com
- Industry: Retailing
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: An online retailer offering bathroom, kitchen, and household products, including freestanding tubs, fixtures, and home accessories.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, plaintiff Rosemarie Ramirez, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Kentucky Home Fashion, LLC for failing to make its website, www.magnushomeproducts.com, accessible to blind users. The plaintiff alleges that the website contains numerous barriers that prevent her from accessing its goods and services, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Key issues include missing alt-text, broken links, and a lack of compatibility with screen-reading software. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and to certify a class of similarly situated individuals.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant’s website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied her full and equal access to the website.
- Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
- An injunction requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
- A declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against the blind.
- Certification of the Class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
- Payment of nominal damages.
- Pre- and post-judgment interest.
- An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.
Proposed Class
all legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182.

