Plaintiff
- Name: Rosemarie Ramirez
- Filing Date: February 6, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: FYF-JB, LLC
- Website: www.jollypets.com
- Industry: Pet Products
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: Offers a wide selection of pet toys, treats, and accessories designed to support active play and engagement for dogs and other pets.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, plaintiff ROSEMARIE RAMIREZ, a visually-impaired individual, is suing FYF-JB, LLC for failing to make its website, www.jollypets.com, accessible to blind users. The plaintiff alleges that she encountered numerous barriers while attempting to access the website to purchase a dog toy, which prevented her from completing her transaction. The complaint cites violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make necessary changes to its website to ensure accessibility for visually-impaired consumers. The plaintiff also seeks class certification for all legally blind individuals who have faced similar issues with the website.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied her full and equal access to the website.
- Defendant has failed to comply with the ADA's accessibility requirements.
Requested Relief
- Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its website accessible to blind individuals.
- Declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against blind individuals.
- Certification of the Class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).
