June 2022
Monthly Website Accessibility Lawsuit Recap
Key takeaways
- 217 website accessibility lawsuits were filed in June.
- Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Retailing were targeted most.
- 7 Plaintiffs filed 41% of the month's website accessibility lawsuits.
- MIZRAHI KROUB LLP filed the most complaints in June with 63 lawsuits in New York.
- Most lawsuits (76%) were filed in New York with California coming in second at 23%
- None of the litigated Websites in June seemed to employ Third-party Overlay tools.
Stay up to date with our Monthly Lawsuit Recap
Lawsuits by Most-Targeted Industries

Consumer Discretionary
19% (43)
Consumer Staples
19% (43)
Retailing
11% (25)
Consumer Durables & Apparel
10% (22)
Consumer Services
6% (15)Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Retailing were targeted most in June with a combined total of 111 lawsuits (thats 51.16%)
Lawsuit Filings Per State

New York
76% (165)
California
23% (50)
Florida
<1% (2)Third-Party Overlays
None of the litigated Websites in June seemed to employ Third-party Overlay tools.
Typically overlays, or widgets, apply a third-party's source code to the existing webpage in an effort to change the user experience by overriding or altering elements of the page. Overlays are often used in-place of manual identification and resolution of accessibility barriers. Because such overlays try to hide underlying accessibility issues, their effectiveness is debated and their use seems to promote the idea that website operators need not concern themselves with the accessibility of their webpages. There has been an increase in the number of lawsuits against websites that use third-party overlays.
Plaintiffs Who Filed the Most Lawsuits
VERONICA MADDY is the most litigious website accessibility plaintiff, filing 18 lawsuits in June.
VERONICA MADDY
18 lawsuits filed
- MADDY v. TP Apparel, LLC
- MADDY v. Paul Labrecque Salon, Inc.
- MADDY v. Paper Source, Inc.
- MADDY v. NEORA, LLC
- MADDY v. MSP DIGITAL, LLC
- MADDY v. Madina Industrial Corp.
- MADDY v. Life Time, Inc.
- MADDY v. Leslie’s Poolmart, Inc.
- MADDY v. Hallmark Cards, Incorporated
- MADDY v. Express, LLC
- MADDY v. Dover Street Market New York, LLC
- MADDY v. Cabinets To Go, LLC
- MADDY v. BUY4LESSTUXEDO.COM, INC.
- MADDY v. Boscov’s Department Store, LLC
- MADDY v. Bodum USA, Inc.
- MADDY v. Blossom Kitchen & Bath Supply Corp.
- MADDY v. BBS BEAUTY SYSTEMS, INC
- MADDY v. Alexandria Professional, LLC
VANESSA JIMENEZ
13 lawsuits filed
- JIMENEZ v. VEGANCUTS INC.
- JIMENEZ v. NEXT LEVEL RESOURCE PARTNERS, INC.
- JIMENEZ v. NEURON PUBLISHING, LLC
- JIMENEZ v. LITHIA MOTORS, INC.
- JIMENEZ v. HCI CLEANING PRODUCTS, LLC
- JIMENEZ v. EVOLVE BRANDS LLC
- JIMENEZ v. ELLEVET SCIENCES LLC
- JIMENEZ v. DANDELION CHOCOLATE, INC.
- JIMENEZ v. COOKUNITY INC.
- JIMENEZ v. CODDLE INC.
- JIMENEZ v. BEXCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
- JIMENEZ v. BELLE AND JUNE, INC.
- JIMENEZ v. AROMA360 LLC
RUSTY RENDON
13 lawsuits filed
- RENDON v. ZENNI OPTICAL, INC.
- RENDON v. THE RAIDER IMAGE, LLC
- RENDON v. SHERWOOD MANAGEMENT CO., INC.
- RENDON v. SETSCHEDULE, INC.
- RENDON v. PLAYTIKA HOLDING CORP.
- RENDON v. OTIS WORLDWIDE CORPORATION
- RENDON v. ONE WATER MARINE HOLDINGS, LLC
- RENDON v. OLO INC.
- RENDON v. OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC.
- RENDON v. NOODLES & COMPANY
- RENDON v. MERGERS MARKETING, INC.
- RENDON v. FIRST FIDELITY BANK
- RENDON v. DAVE & BUSTER’S, INC.
RAMON FONTANEZ
13 lawsuits filed
- FONTANEZ v. ZIWI USA INCORPORATED
- FONTANEZ v. RHYTHM SUPERFOODS, LLC
- FONTANEZ v. NAVITAS LLC
- FONTANEZ v. MILK + HONEY SPA DOWNTOWN LLC
- FONTANEZ v. MAD HIPPIE, LLC
- FONTANEZ v. LIME CRIME, INC.
- FONTANEZ v. L’OREAL USA, INC.
- FONTANEZ v. HEIRLUME USA INC.
- FONTANEZ v. GASKETS ACQUISITION LLC
- FONTANEZ v. CHOCXO CHOCOLATIER LLC
- FONTANEZ v. BREUER PREMIUM PET FOOD COMPANY, INC.
- FONTANEZ v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC.
LUIS LICEA
13 lawsuits filed
- LICEA v. ZOCALO FOODS, INC.
- LICEA v. WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
- LICEA v. SAMEDAY TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- LICEA v. REPLICATED GRASS SYSTEMS INC.
- LICEA v. PRINTOGRAPH, INC.
- LICEA v. PINK LOTUS ELEMENTS, LLC
- LICEA v. OPTIMIZERX CORPORATION
- LICEA v. MASRI SHOES, INC.
- LICEA v. MAILMYPRESCRIPTIONS.COM PHARMACY CORPORATION
- LICEA v. KATHY KUO DESIGNS INC.
- LICEA v. HOT TOPIC, INC.
- LICEA v. DESTINATIONS TO RECOVERY, LLC
- LICEA v. CLICKSTOP, INC.
Law Firms That Filed the Most Lawsuits
MIZRAHI KROUB LLP
New York.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS, APC
California.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
MARS KHAIMOV LAW, PLLC
New York.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
STEIN SAKS, PLLC
New York.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
SHAKED LAW GROUP, P.C.
New York.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
MIZRAHI KROUB LLP filed the most complaints in June with 63 lawsuits in New York. PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS, APC came in second place with 38 filings in California.