Skip to main content

Monthly report

Digital accessibility lawsuitsDecember 2025

170 federal disability-access cases were filed across 15 states, and the pattern is consistent: a small group of repeat plaintiffs, one law firm, and an online shop that could not be used.

170cases filed
86%could not complete a purchase
92%brought by a repeat plaintiff
65%filed by a single law firm

Counts cover all 170 filings, and the percentages come from an in-depth review of 65 of them.

  • This is repeat litigation. 92% of the complaints we read were brought by someone who has sued over a website before. One of them, Nelson Fernandez, accounts for 112 earlier cases in our archive.

  • One firm dominates. Equal Access Law Group PLLC filed 65% of them.

  • The claim barely varies. Every complaint cited the ADA, nearly every one asked a court to order the site fixed, and 82% sought a nationwide class.

  • WCAG 2.2 is the yardstick. 69% of the complaints measured the site against WCAG 2.2, more than every other version put together.

  • Being sued once is not the end of it. 8 of this month’s defendants, or the websites they run, are already in our archive of 12,982 cases.

97%asked a court to order the website fixed
82%sought a class covering the whole country
65%asked for compensatory damages

Read the full report

The headline figures are open to everyone. The report behind this form is the working detail: what 65 complaints actually said, and the companies, plaintiffs and firms behind them.

  • What the complaints alleged, set against what scanners actually find
  • The relief asked for, the laws cited and the WCAG version named
  • Selected companies sued this month, each linked to its case
  • The defendants already in our archive
  • Where the cases were filed, across 15 states
  • The plaintiffs behind them and the firms acting for them

It opens straight away. We also email you a link so you can find it again in your account, with every month from now on.