Skip to main content

Monthly report

Digital accessibility lawsuitsApril 2026

Federal website accessibility filings fell 23% in April 2026 to 250 cases, but nearly all came from plaintiffs who had sued before.

250cases filed
77%could not complete a purchase
99%brought by a repeat plaintiff
66%filed by a single law firm

Counts cover all 250 filings, and the percentages come from an in-depth review of 149 of them.

  • Equal Access Law Group PLLC filed 66% of all complaints, up from 51% in March and more than ten times the share of any other firm.

  • 99% of complaints were brought by plaintiffs with at least one earlier case in the archive, up from 82% in March.

  • WCAG 2.2 was named in 70% of complaints, up from 56% in March and now five times as common as WCAG 2.1.

  • Nelson Fernandez, with 113 earlier cases in the archive, was among this month's plaintiffs, the highest repeat count.

  • 45 defendants had already been sued in an earlier case, demonstrating that one complaint does not end a company's exposure.

97%asked a court to order the website fixed
73%sought a class covering the whole country
16%asked for compensatory damages

Read the full report

The headline figures are open to everyone. The report behind this form is the working detail: what 149 complaints actually said, and the companies, plaintiffs and firms behind them.

  • What the complaints alleged, set against what scanners actually find
  • The relief asked for, the laws cited and the WCAG version named
  • Selected companies sued this month, each linked to its case
  • The defendants already in our archive
  • Where the cases were filed, across 16 states
  • The plaintiffs behind them and the firms acting for them

It opens straight away. We also email you a link so you can find it again in your account, with every month from now on.