Plaintiff
- Name: Nicole Davis
- Filing Date: December 9, 2025
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Equal Access Law Group, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Yoogi's Closet, Inc.
- Website: yoogiscloset.com
- Industry: Retailing
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.2
- Summary: Yoogi's Closet provides an online platform for consumers to purchase luxury apparel, footwear, and accessories, including designer handbags, clothing, and other fashion items.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Nicole Davis, a visually impaired individual, is suing Yoogi's Closet, Inc. for failing to make their website, Yoogiscloset.com, accessible to blind users. The plaintiff alleges that the website contains significant barriers that prevent visually impaired individuals from completing transactions, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Key issues include the lack of proper navigation aids, ambiguous link texts, and reliance on a visual interface that excludes blind users. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and compensatory damages for the class members affected by these barriers.
Causes of Action
- Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered multiple accessibility barriers preventing her from completing a purchase.
- Defendant failed to implement necessary modifications to make the website accessible.
Requested Relief
- Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make the website accessible.
- Compensatory damages for the class members.
- Certification of the case as a class action.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Yoogiscloset.com and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by Yoogiscloset.com, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182, with venue being proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).