Plaintiff
- Name: Marcos Calcano
- Filing Date: September 18, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Southern District of New York
- State: New York
- Attorney Firm: Gottlieb & Associates PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Ledge Lounger, Inc.
- Website: www.ledgeloungers.com
- Industry: Retailing
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.0
- Summary: Operates an online retail store offering in-pool loungers, chairs, outdoor furniture, and related goods and services.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Marcos Calcano, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Ledge Lounger, Inc. for failing to make its website, www.ledgeloungers.com, accessible to blind users. The complaint alleges that the website contains numerous barriers that prevent blind individuals from accessing its products and services, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and related New York laws. Calcano seeks a permanent injunction to require the company to improve website accessibility and compensatory damages for the discrimination faced. The complaint highlights specific access issues, including lack of alternative text for images and broken links, which hinder the ability of visually-impaired users to navigate the site effectively.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.
- Violations of the NYSHRL
- Violations of the NYCHRL
- Violation of GBL § 349
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired persons.
- Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers while attempting to use the website.
- Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.0 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its Website accessible to blind individuals.
- Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law and GBL § 349.
- Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
The Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12181, as Plaintiff’s claims arise under Title III of the ADA and related state laws.

