Plaintiff
- Name: Joseph Lamperis
- Filing Date: June 1, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Tilevera, LLC
- Website: www.cletile.com
- Industry: Consumer Goods
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: Offers high-end, artisan handcrafted tiles used in interior and architectural design, allowing customers to explore collections and purchase products online.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Joseph Lamperis, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Tilevera, LLC for failing to make its website, www.cletile.com, accessible to blind users, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Lamperis alleges that he encountered numerous barriers while attempting to access the website to purchase a specific tile, which prevented him from enjoying the same shopping experience as sighted individuals. The complaint cites various access barriers, including missing alt-text and broken links, and seeks a permanent injunction requiring the defendant to comply with accessibility standards. Lamperis represents a class of legally blind individuals who have faced similar issues accessing the website.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied full access to the website.
- Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
- An injunction requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
- A declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against the blind.
- Certification of the Class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
- Payment of nominal damages.
- Pre- and post-judgment interest.
- An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).

