Plaintiff
- Name: Howard Wilson
- Filing Date: June 3, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: League Outfitters, LLC
- Website: www.leagueoutfitters.com
- Industry: Apparel
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: Offers a wide range of athletic apparel and equipment, including football gear, training apparel, and protective equipment for sports.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Howard Wilson, a visually-impaired individual, is suing League Outfitters, LLC for failing to make its website, www.leagueoutfitters.com, accessible to blind users as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Wilson alleges that he encountered multiple barriers while attempting to access the website to purchase football shoulder pads, which prevented him from enjoying the same shopping experience as sighted individuals. The complaint cites specific access barriers and claims that the website does not comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Wilson seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and to certify a class of similarly situated individuals.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied full access to the website.
- Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
- An injunction requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
- A declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against the blind.
- Class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
- Payment of nominal damages.
- Pre- and post-judgment interest.
- An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).
