Plaintiff
- Name: Howard Wilson
- Filing Date: July 8, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Just Candy, LLC
- Website: www.justcandy.com
- Industry: Consumer Goods
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: Offers a wide selection of candies organized by type, brand, occasion, and packaging format for direct purchase by consumers.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Howard Wilson, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Just Candy, LLC for failing to make its website, www.justcandy.com, accessible to blind users as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Wilson alleges that he encountered numerous barriers while attempting to access the website to purchase Christmas Party Candy, including missing alt-text and broken links, which prevented him from having an equal shopping experience. He seeks a permanent injunction to require Just Candy to comply with accessibility standards and to ensure that its website is usable by individuals with disabilities. The complaint also seeks class certification for all legally blind individuals who have faced similar issues with the website.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant’s website is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied full access to the website.
- Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.
- A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
- A declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against the blind.
- An order certifying the Class and appointing Plaintiff as Class Representative.
Proposed Class
all legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).

