Plaintiff
- Name: Howard Wilson
- Filing Date: July 8, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Jackery, Inc.
- Website: www.jackery.com
- Industry: Consumer Goods
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: Offers portable power solutions, including power stations, solar generators, and energy storage systems designed for home backup and outdoor use.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Howard Wilson, a visually impaired individual, is suing Jackery, Inc. for failing to make its website, www.jackery.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Wilson alleges that he encountered numerous barriers while attempting to access the website to purchase a home power solution, which prevented him from fully utilizing the site. The complaint cites specific access issues such as missing alt-text and broken links. Wilson seeks a permanent injunction requiring Jackery to comply with accessibility standards and to implement changes to ensure equal access for visually impaired users.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant’s website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied full access to the website.
- Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
- An injunction requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
- A declaration that Defendant discriminates against the blind through its website.
- Certification of the Class and appointment of Plaintiff as Class Representative.
- Payment of nominal damages.
- Pre- and post-judgment interest.
- An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).

