Plaintiff
- Name: Howard Wilson
- Filing Date: February 5, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Columbus Running Company, LLC
- Website: www.columbusrunning.com
- Industry: Retailing
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: A specialty retailer focused on serving runners with footwear, apparel, accessories, and service support, including fitting and training resources.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Plaintiff HOWARD WILSON, a visually-impaired individual, is suing COLUMBUS RUNNING COMPANY, LLC for failing to make its website, www.columbusrunning.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The plaintiff alleges that he encountered multiple barriers while attempting to purchase a running shoe, specifically the Brooks Men's Hyperion Max 3, which prevented him from accessing the website's goods and services. The complaint cites various access barriers, including missing alt-text and broken links, which hinder the use of screen-reading software. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make its website accessible and to change corporate policies to ensure ongoing compliance with accessibility standards.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied full access to the website.
- Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its website accessible.
- Declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against blind individuals.
- Certification of the Class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).

