Plaintiff
- Name: Haron Cole
- Filing Date: February 6, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Equal Access Law Group, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Hint, Inc.
- Website: www.drinkhint.com
- Industry: Beverages
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.2
- Summary: Provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including flavored still water, sparkling water, variety packs, bulk cases, and subscription bundles focused on sugar-free, unsweetened hydration beverages.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Haron Cole, a visually impaired individual, is suing Hint, Inc. for failing to make its website, https://www.drinkhint.com, accessible to blind users. Cole alleges that the website contains significant barriers that prevent him and others from independently navigating and completing purchases. The complaint cites violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and seeks a permanent injunction to require Hint, Inc. to make necessary changes to its website to ensure accessibility for visually impaired individuals. Cole claims that the lack of accessible features denies him equal access to the products and services offered online, which include flavored water and subscription options.
Causes of Action
- Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals
- Defendant failed to provide necessary accommodations for screen-reader users
- Access barriers prevent blind individuals from completing transactions
Requested Relief
- Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make the Website accessible
- Compensatory damages for Class Members
- Certification of the case as a class action
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access the Website and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by the Website, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).

