Plaintiff
- Name: Geovanni Bahena Figueroa
- Filing Date: February 6, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Wacoal America, Inc.
- Website: www.cw-x.com
- Industry: Apparel
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: Offers performance apparel including compression wear, athletic bottoms, tops, recovery garments, and training essentials designed for athletic performance.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Plaintiff GEOVANNI BAHENA FIGUEROA, a visually-impaired individual, is suing WACOAL AMERICA, INC. for failing to make its website, www.cw-x.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The plaintiff alleges that he encountered numerous barriers while attempting to purchase Muscle Support Compression apparel, including missing alt-text and broken links, which denied him full access to the website's services. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to comply with accessibility standards and to change its corporate policies to ensure future compliance. The case is filed as a class action on behalf of all legally blind individuals who have faced similar issues accessing the website.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers preventing access to the website's goods and services.
- Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its website accessible.
- Declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against blind individuals.
- Certification of the Class.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).
