Plaintiff
- Name: Geovanni Bahena Figueroa
- Filing Date: January 5, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Stein Saks, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Holistic Vet Blend, LLC
- Website: www.holisticvetblend.com
- Industry: Consumer Goods
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.1
- Summary: Retailer specializing in human-grade premixes and complete meals for dogs and cats, focusing on natural and premium ingredients, organic components, and home-style preparation.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Plaintiff GEOVANNI BAHENA FIGUEROA, a visually-impaired individual, is suing HOLISTIC VET BLEND, LLC for failing to make its website, www.holisticvetblend.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The plaintiff alleges that he encountered multiple barriers while attempting to access the website to purchase pet food, which denied him full and equal access to the goods and services offered. The complaint cites specific access issues such as missing alt-text and broken links that hinder the use of screen-reading software. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and to change corporate policies to ensure ongoing compliance with accessibility standards.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Defendant’s website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied full access to the website.
- Defendant has failed to comply with the ADA requirements for website accessibility.
Requested Relief
- Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its website accessible to blind individuals.
- Certification of the Class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
- Payment of nominal damages.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).

