Plaintiff
- Name: Frangie Espinal
- Filing Date: July 23, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Southern District of New York
- State: New York
- Attorney Firm: Gottlieb & Associates PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Eric Javits Operations LLC
- Website: ericjavits.com
- Industry: Retailing
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.0
- Summary: Operates an online retail store offering hats, handbags, and accessories.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Frangie Espinal, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Eric Javits Operations LLC for failing to make its website accessible to blind users. The complaint alleges that the website, https://ericjavits.com/, contains multiple barriers that prevent visually-impaired individuals from accessing its goods and services, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and related New York laws. Espinal seeks a permanent injunction requiring the defendant to improve website accessibility and claims damages for the discrimination faced. The case is filed as a class action on behalf of all legally blind individuals who have faced similar issues.
Causes of Action
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.
- Violations of the NYSHRL
- Violations of the NYCHRL
- Violation of GBL § 349
Key Allegations
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired persons.
- Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers while attempting to use the website.
- Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.0 guidelines.
Requested Relief
- A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA and related laws.
- A declaration that Defendant's website discriminates against the blind.
- Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York laws.
- Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
Proposed Class
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
The Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12181, as Plaintiff’s claims arise under Title III of the ADA and related state laws.

