Plaintiff
- Name: Debbie Pittman
- Filing Date: March 10, 2026
- Court: United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
- State: Illinois
- Attorney Firm: Equal Access Law Group, PLLC
Defendant
- Name: Beauty Care Choices
- Website: www.beautycarechoices.com
- Industry: Beauty
- Standards Cited: WCAG 2.2
- Summary: Provides consumers access to an array of beauty and personal care products, including hair care, skin care, makeup, nail products, beauty tools, grooming items, and wellness products.
Case Summary
According to the complaint, Debbie Pittman, a visually impaired individual, is suing Beauty Care Choices for failing to make its website, beautycarechoices.com, accessible to blind users. Pittman alleges that the website contains significant barriers that prevent her and others from independently navigating and completing purchases. The complaint cites violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and seeks both injunctive relief to make the website accessible and compensatory damages for the discrimination faced. Pittman claims that the website's design relies heavily on visual elements, making it unusable for individuals who depend on screen-reading software.
Causes of Action
- Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Declaratory Relief
Key Allegations
- Website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals
- Access barriers prevent independent navigation and transactions
- Defendant failed to implement necessary accessibility features
Requested Relief
- Preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA
- Injunction requiring Defendant to make the Website compliant with the ADA
- Declaration that the Website discriminates against the visually impaired
- Order certifying this case as a class action
- Pre- and post-judgment interest
- Award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees
Proposed Class
all legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access the Website and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by the Website, during the relevant statutory period.
Jurisdiction & Venue
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 12182; venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(1) and (2).
